Discursive Activism, Cyber-Harassment, and Safe Spaces: Situating the Analysis

It’s my contention that activists in spaces such as for instance Bye Felipe are engaged in functions of governmental imagination, settlement, discussion, and disagreement that is productive and therefore these functions constitute discursive activism. But before you go on to evaluate Bye Felipe in these terms, i shall determine discursive activism and situate my analysis within the appropriate literary works on cyber-misogyny and online harassment, safe areas, and shaming.

We argue that individuals in feminist networks that are online web sites take part in discursive activism by negotiating counter-hegemonic discourses and creating feminist claims (see also Shaw, 2012a, p. 7). This notion of discursive activism builds on work by Katzenstein (1995), Maddison (2013), and younger (1997) regarding the need for discursive politics when you look at the movement that is feminist. Discursive activism or discursive politics is rhetorical action that intervenes in and produces brand brand brand new discourses by determining and unpacking energy relations in current discourses. In Shaw (2012b), We argued that the development of safe areas is essential for the growth of discursive claims. Bloggers gather in like-minded groups for reasons of discursive politics, so that you can create claims that are political react to aggressive discourses being a collective.

More particularly, the activism that Bye Felipe partcipates in primarily attracts focus on and interrupts gendered harassment that is online. On line harassment has become a problem that is getting a growing level of attention, covered (often sensationally) into the news usually with regards to of cyberbullying, while additionally becoming a location for policy campaigning and policing, framed as e-Safety or cybersafety. Some policy discourses around these problems can be patronizing and likewise sensational, and even can reinforce or perpetuate a number of the gendered harms of harassment by encouraging victim-blaming and sexual shame (Albury & Crawford, 2012; Dobson & Ringrose, 2015, p. 2), nonetheless they mirror a change when you look at the severity with which on line harassment is observed.